# Cache-warming lifecycle handoff (FE → backend) — CR-4 — **RESOLVED ✅ 2026-06-12** > **Closed.** Backend reply: `../arch-rewrite/frontend-cache-warming-lifecycle-handoff.md` > (`ui-contract@0.2.0` + `transport-contract@0.9.0`). All asks shipped; FE consumed + live-probed > 17/17 (`scripts/probe-cache-warming.ts` against `bin/up`). CR-4d turned out to be an FE bug (our > WS parser dropped the `conversationId` echo on the initial `surface` message) — fixed FE-side. > Current status lives in `backend-handoff.md` §2. Original report kept below for history. > **From:** dispatch-web · **To:** arch-rewrite · **Courier:** the user. > User-reported symptoms, investigated FE-side with a live probe against a running backend > (`bin/up2` stack, HTTP :25203 / surface WS :25205, 2026-06-12). Repro tool: > `dispatch-web/scripts/probe-cache-warming.ts` (drives the FE's real WS adapter + the > `cache-warming` surface; safe to re-run to verify fixes). > > **Verdict up front:** the FE renders the surface data faithfully — symptoms 1 and 2 are > backend data/behavior; symptom 3 needs a new backend affordance (FE will wire it on arrival). ## User-reported symptoms 1. Warming is **ON by default** for a new conversation — the user has to manually turn it off. Wanted: default OFF, opt-in per conversation. 2. With warming enabled, **no usable countdown** to the next refresh — the user can't tell whether refreshes are happening at all. 3. Wanted lifecycle: refreshes **keep running when the browser window closes** (✅ already true, verified — see below), but **closing the conversation's tab in the app should stop the refreshes AND abort any in-flight generation** (closing the tab = "done with this chat for now"). ## Probe evidence (verbatim observations) Fresh conversation (first turn sealed), then `subscribe {surfaceId:"cache-warming", conversationId}`: - **Initial spec:** `toggle value: true`, `number value: 240` (s), timer payload `{ nextWarmAt: , lastWarmAt: null }` → **enabled by default, warm already scheduled**. Confirms symptom 1 is backend default state. - `invoke cache-warming/set-interval payload:20` → update with a FUTURE `nextWarmAt` (+20s). ✅ - **Automatic warms DO repeat and DO push updates** — 3 warms observed at ~21s spacing (interval 20s), each pushing an `update` with fresh `Last Cache %` / `Cache retention` stats. So the engine itself works. - **BUG (symptom 2 root cause): every post-warm `update` carries a STALE `nextWarmAt` — the fire time of the warm that JUST completed (i.e. in the past), never the next scheduled one.** Observed sequence (epoch ms): | update after | nextWarmAt | lastWarmAt | note | |---|---|---|---| | warm #1 | 1781246273405 | 1781246274299 | nextWarmAt < lastWarmAt (past) | | warm #2 | 1781246294299 | 1781246295269 | = warm#1.lastWarmAt + 20 000 → still past | | warm #3 | 1781246315269 | 1781246315998 | = warm#2.lastWarmAt + 20 000 → still past | The pattern shows the reschedule math exists (`next = lastWarm + interval`) but the surface update is emitted with the PRE-warm snapshot; the post-reschedule (future) `nextWarmAt` is never pushed. The FE countdown is authoritative off `nextWarmAt` (per the cache-warming handoff design), so after the FIRST automatic warm the UI shows "Next warm in 0s" forever — exactly the user's "I can't tell if it's working". - Same staleness after a real chat turn while subscribed: last update after `turn-sealed` still carried a past `nextWarmAt` (−10s and counting), even though a warm was presumably scheduled. - **Browser-closed continuity ✅:** the schedule is fully server-side — warms fired with no browser attached (only the headless probe socket). Symptom 3's "keep running when the window closes" half already works; do not regress it. - **Contract deviation (minor):** the initial `surface` reply to a conversation-scoped subscribe does NOT echo `conversationId` (updates do). `ui-contract` says the echo should be present ("echoes the subscribe's conversation … so the client routes it"). The FE currently tolerates the missing echo (treats no-echo as current), but that weakens stale-scope filtering on fast conversation switches — please echo it. ## Asks ### CR-4a — default warming to OFF for a new conversation New conversations currently start `enabled: true`, interval 240s, first warm scheduled immediately. Make the default `enabled: false` (no warm scheduled until the user opts in). No contract change — it's the initial state of the existing surface. ### CR-4b — push the refreshed (future) `nextWarmAt` after each automatic warm After a warm completes + the next one is scheduled, the emitted surface `update`'s `cache-warming-timer` payload must carry the NEW future `nextWarmAt` (and the new `lastWarmAt`). Either emit the update after rescheduling or emit a second update — FE is indifferent; it just renders the authoritative timestamp. (Same applies to the post-`turn-sealed` reschedule path.) No contract change — it's the payload of the existing custom field. ### CR-4c — a "conversation closed" affordance (stop warming + abort generation) The FE needs to tell the backend "the user closed this conversation's tab": that should (1) disable/stop cache-warming for the conversation and (2) abort any in-flight turn. Today there is no path: - `chat.unsubscribe` / socket close explicitly never stops the turn (by design — keep that); - surface `unsubscribe` doesn't touch the warming schedule (correct for mere disconnects); - `POST /conversations/:id/cancel` is DEFERRED in `transport-contract`; - programmatically invoking `cache-warming/toggle` is unsuitable: it FLIPS with no payload, so it's racy as an explicit "disable" (and doesn't abort generation). Preferred shape (backend's call): a single explicit `POST /conversations/:id/close` (or WS message) that does both, OR un-defer `/cancel` + accept an optional explicit boolean payload on `cache-warming/toggle`. Whatever ships, the FE wires it into its tab-close path. Note the asymmetry the user wants: browser/socket disconnect ⇒ warming continues; explicit tab close ⇒ warming + generation stop. ### CR-4d (minor) — echo `conversationId` on the initial `surface` message Per the `ui-contract` doc comment on `SurfaceMessage` (see deviation above). ## FE-side follow-ups (ours, queued behind the above) - Harden the countdown display: a past `nextWarmAt` renders as "waiting…" instead of a stuck "0s" (cosmetic guard; CR-4b is the real fix). - On CR-4c shipping: call the close affordance from `store.closeTab()`; re-pin + re-mirror the contract; extend `scripts/probe-cache-warming.ts` to verify default-off + post-warm countdown.