| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Previously the following code did not produce the expected results:
```ruby
bx = binding
block = bx.eval("a = 1; proc { a }")
bx.eval("a = 2")
p block.call # Expect 2 but return 1 due to a bug
```
The previous implementation of `Binding#eval` evaluated the code and then merged the top layer variables.
This patch will parse and expand the variable space before making a call to `eval`.
This means that the call to `Binding#eval` will do the parsing twice.
In addition, the following changes will be made:
- Make `mrb_parser_foreach_top_variable()`, `mrb_binding_extract_proc()` and `mrb_binding_extract_env()` functions private global functions.
- Remove the `posthook` argument from `mrb_exec_irep()`.
The `posthook` argument was introduced to implement the `binding` method.
This patch is unnecessary because it uses a different implementation method.
ref #5362
fixed #5491
|
|
The `MRB_OBJ_ALLOC()` macro function returns a pointer of the type corresponding to the constant literal defined in `enum mrb_vtype`.
|
|
ref #5362
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Added to `mruby-binding-core`
- `Binding#local_variable_defined?`
- `Binding#local_variable_get`
- `Binding#local_variable_set`
- `Binding#local_variables`
- `Binding#receiver`
- `Binding#source_location`
- `Binding#inspect`
- Added to `mruby-proc-binding`
- `Proc#binding`
The reason for separating `Proc#binding` is that core-mrbgems has a method that returns a closure object to minimize possible problems with being able to manipulate internal variables.
By separating it as different mrbgem, each user can judge this problem and incorporate it arbitrarily.
|
|
Make changes to make `Binding` work.
At the same time, it separates `Binding#eval`, which depends on `mruby-eval`, from `mruby-binding-core`.
|
|
|
