From 0ab21a9a5e487a0d50988adb5d6c4114364acd3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Yukihiro \"Matz\" Matsumoto" Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:05:11 +0900 Subject: Stack adjustment should be based on `p->upper`; fix #3857 It used to be based on `ci->proc` but the callinfo position may be wrong when `ecall()` is called during stack rewinding from `OP_RETURN`. --- src/vm.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'src') diff --git a/src/vm.c b/src/vm.c index 5a472c1e2..90941bcfe 100644 --- a/src/vm.c +++ b/src/vm.c @@ -309,7 +309,6 @@ static void ecall(mrb_state *mrb) { struct RProc *p; - int nregs; struct mrb_context *c = mrb->c; mrb_callinfo *ci = c->ci; struct RObject *exc; @@ -325,7 +324,6 @@ ecall(mrb_state *mrb) p = c->ensure[i]; if (!p) return; mrb_assert(!MRB_PROC_CFUNC_P(p)); - nregs = ci->proc->body.irep->nregs; c->ensure[i] = NULL; cioff = ci - c->cibase; ci = cipush(mrb); @@ -338,7 +336,7 @@ ecall(mrb_state *mrb) ci->target_class = MRB_PROC_TARGET_CLASS(p); env = MRB_PROC_ENV(p); mrb_assert(env); - c->stack += nregs; + c->stack += p->upper->body.irep->nregs; exc = mrb->exc; mrb->exc = 0; if (exc) { mrb_gc_protect(mrb, mrb_obj_value(exc)); -- cgit v1.2.3