| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
RAYMATH_EXTERN_INLINE was renamed to RAYMATH_HEADER_ONLY, which user code
may define if they want to use it as header-only library. If multiple
files in the same project define RAYMATH_HEADER_ONLY, they might each
have duplicate out-of-line definitions of the same functions.
By default, raymath.h exposes inline definitions, which instructs the
compiler _not_ to generate out-of-line definitons, if out-of-line
definitions are required, those of the file defined with
RAYLIB_IMPLEMENTATION are used instead. There may be only one such file.
In C++ mode, the compiler will select only one out-of-line definition
automatically, so no need to define a RAYLIB_IMPLEMENTATION.
Unfortunately, we have to remove raymath function declaration from
raylib.h as those declarations would lead to duplicate out-of-line
definitions which would yield linker errors. This problem didn't
exist with GNU89 or C++, because there multiple defintions are ok,
but in C99 they aren't.
|
|
This reverts commit 6ffc8cb7990fb4ff40f205cb53bec797b10e48a2.
and commit e4d7bbec1ef08279495ac41f5f8c4be359c58cf0.
which I pushed by mistake...
|
|
RAYMATH_EXTERN_INLINE was renamed to RAYMATH_HEADER_ONLY, which user code
may define if they want to use it as header-only library. If multiple
files in the same project define RAYMATH_HEADER_ONLY, they might each
have duplicate out-of-line definitions of the same functions.
By default, raymath.h exposes inline definitions, which instructs the
compiler _not_ to generate out-of-line definitons, if out-of-line
definitions are required, those of the file defined with
RAYLIB_IMPLEMENTATION are used instead. There may be only one such file.
In C++ mode, the compiler will select only one out-of-line definition
automatically, so no need to define a RAYLIB_IMPLEMENTATION.
Unfortunately, we have to remove raymath function declaration from
raylib.h as those declarations would lead to duplicate out-of-line
definitions which would yield linker errors. This problem didn't
exist with GNU89 or C++, because there multiple defintions are ok,
but in C99 they aren't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
