summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/backend-handoff-cache-warming.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'backend-handoff-cache-warming.md')
-rw-r--r--backend-handoff-cache-warming.md102
1 files changed, 102 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/backend-handoff-cache-warming.md b/backend-handoff-cache-warming.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a0019f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/backend-handoff-cache-warming.md
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+# Cache-warming lifecycle handoff (FE → backend) — CR-4 — **RESOLVED ✅ 2026-06-12**
+
+> **Closed.** Backend reply: `../arch-rewrite/frontend-cache-warming-lifecycle-handoff.md`
+> (`[email protected]` + `[email protected]`). All asks shipped; FE consumed + live-probed
+> 17/17 (`scripts/probe-cache-warming.ts` against `bin/up`). CR-4d turned out to be an FE bug (our
+> WS parser dropped the `conversationId` echo on the initial `surface` message) — fixed FE-side.
+> Current status lives in `backend-handoff.md` §2. Original report kept below for history.
+
+> **From:** dispatch-web · **To:** arch-rewrite · **Courier:** the user.
+> User-reported symptoms, investigated FE-side with a live probe against a running backend
+> (`bin/up2` stack, HTTP :25203 / surface WS :25205, 2026-06-12). Repro tool:
+> `dispatch-web/scripts/probe-cache-warming.ts` (drives the FE's real WS adapter + the
+> `cache-warming` surface; safe to re-run to verify fixes).
+>
+> **Verdict up front:** the FE renders the surface data faithfully — symptoms 1 and 2 are
+> backend data/behavior; symptom 3 needs a new backend affordance (FE will wire it on arrival).
+
+## User-reported symptoms
+
+1. Warming is **ON by default** for a new conversation — the user has to manually turn it off.
+ Wanted: default OFF, opt-in per conversation.
+2. With warming enabled, **no usable countdown** to the next refresh — the user can't tell
+ whether refreshes are happening at all.
+3. Wanted lifecycle: refreshes **keep running when the browser window closes** (✅ already true,
+ verified — see below), but **closing the conversation's tab in the app should stop the
+ refreshes AND abort any in-flight generation** (closing the tab = "done with this chat for now").
+
+## Probe evidence (verbatim observations)
+
+Fresh conversation (first turn sealed), then `subscribe {surfaceId:"cache-warming", conversationId}`:
+
+- **Initial spec:** `toggle value: true`, `number value: 240` (s), timer payload
+ `{ nextWarmAt: <now+240s>, lastWarmAt: null }` → **enabled by default, warm already scheduled**.
+ Confirms symptom 1 is backend default state.
+- `invoke cache-warming/set-interval payload:20` → update with a FUTURE `nextWarmAt` (+20s). ✅
+- **Automatic warms DO repeat and DO push updates** — 3 warms observed at ~21s spacing
+ (interval 20s), each pushing an `update` with fresh `Last Cache %` / `Cache retention` stats.
+ So the engine itself works.
+- **BUG (symptom 2 root cause): every post-warm `update` carries a STALE `nextWarmAt` — the fire
+ time of the warm that JUST completed (i.e. in the past), never the next scheduled one.**
+ Observed sequence (epoch ms):
+
+ | update after | nextWarmAt | lastWarmAt | note |
+ |---|---|---|---|
+ | warm #1 | 1781246273405 | 1781246274299 | nextWarmAt < lastWarmAt (past) |
+ | warm #2 | 1781246294299 | 1781246295269 | = warm#1.lastWarmAt + 20 000 → still past |
+ | warm #3 | 1781246315269 | 1781246315998 | = warm#2.lastWarmAt + 20 000 → still past |
+
+ The pattern shows the reschedule math exists (`next = lastWarm + interval`) but the surface
+ update is emitted with the PRE-warm snapshot; the post-reschedule (future) `nextWarmAt` is
+ never pushed. The FE countdown is authoritative off `nextWarmAt` (per the cache-warming
+ handoff design), so after the FIRST automatic warm the UI shows "Next warm in 0s" forever —
+ exactly the user's "I can't tell if it's working".
+- Same staleness after a real chat turn while subscribed: last update after `turn-sealed` still
+ carried a past `nextWarmAt` (−10s and counting), even though a warm was presumably scheduled.
+- **Browser-closed continuity ✅:** the schedule is fully server-side — warms fired with no
+ browser attached (only the headless probe socket). Symptom 3's "keep running when the window
+ closes" half already works; do not regress it.
+- **Contract deviation (minor):** the initial `surface` reply to a conversation-scoped subscribe
+ does NOT echo `conversationId` (updates do). `ui-contract` says the echo should be present
+ ("echoes the subscribe's conversation … so the client routes it"). The FE currently tolerates
+ the missing echo (treats no-echo as current), but that weakens stale-scope filtering on fast
+ conversation switches — please echo it.
+
+## Asks
+
+### CR-4a — default warming to OFF for a new conversation
+New conversations currently start `enabled: true`, interval 240s, first warm scheduled
+immediately. Make the default `enabled: false` (no warm scheduled until the user opts in).
+No contract change — it's the initial state of the existing surface.
+
+### CR-4b — push the refreshed (future) `nextWarmAt` after each automatic warm
+After a warm completes + the next one is scheduled, the emitted surface `update`'s
+`cache-warming-timer` payload must carry the NEW future `nextWarmAt` (and the new `lastWarmAt`).
+Either emit the update after rescheduling or emit a second update — FE is indifferent; it just
+renders the authoritative timestamp. (Same applies to the post-`turn-sealed` reschedule path.)
+No contract change — it's the payload of the existing custom field.
+
+### CR-4c — a "conversation closed" affordance (stop warming + abort generation)
+The FE needs to tell the backend "the user closed this conversation's tab": that should
+(1) disable/stop cache-warming for the conversation and (2) abort any in-flight turn.
+Today there is no path:
+- `chat.unsubscribe` / socket close explicitly never stops the turn (by design — keep that);
+- surface `unsubscribe` doesn't touch the warming schedule (correct for mere disconnects);
+- `POST /conversations/:id/cancel` is DEFERRED in `transport-contract`;
+- programmatically invoking `cache-warming/toggle` is unsuitable: it FLIPS with no payload, so
+ it's racy as an explicit "disable" (and doesn't abort generation).
+
+Preferred shape (backend's call): a single explicit `POST /conversations/:id/close` (or WS
+message) that does both, OR un-defer `/cancel` + accept an optional explicit boolean payload on
+`cache-warming/toggle`. Whatever ships, the FE wires it into its tab-close path. Note the
+asymmetry the user wants: browser/socket disconnect ⇒ warming continues; explicit tab close ⇒
+warming + generation stop.
+
+### CR-4d (minor) — echo `conversationId` on the initial `surface` message
+Per the `ui-contract` doc comment on `SurfaceMessage` (see deviation above).
+
+## FE-side follow-ups (ours, queued behind the above)
+- Harden the countdown display: a past `nextWarmAt` renders as "waiting…" instead of a stuck
+ "0s" (cosmetic guard; CR-4b is the real fix).
+- On CR-4c shipping: call the close affordance from `store.closeTab()`; re-pin + re-mirror the
+ contract; extend `scripts/probe-cache-warming.ts` to verify default-off + post-warm countdown.